beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.09.21 2017나10696

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The court of first instance dismissed all the plaintiff's principal claim and the defendant's counterclaim. Accordingly, the defendant only appealed against the part of the counterclaim claim in the court of first instance, and the plaintiff did not appeal. Thus, the scope of the court's trial is limited to the part of the counterclaim claim in the judgment of first instance.

2. The defendant's appeal as to the part of the counterclaim claim cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and it is reasonable to view that there was an agreement between the original defendant on the payment of additional construction cost in light of the following circumstances, i.e., the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance, even if it is reasonable to view that there was an agreement between the original defendant on the payment of additional construction cost, in view of the fact that the defendant's unit price of the vegetation and the reinforced block specifically

Therefore, this court's judgment is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing it by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. In conclusion, the part concerning the counterclaim in the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal against it is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.