A. On June 13, 1994, the Plaintiff and C have three children, including those of 194, those of 1994, those of 1997, those of 2007, who were legally married couple who completed the marriage report.

B. A around November 2017, C came to know with the Defendant since the Defendant became a guest at a single-speaker shop that the Defendant works, and C via phone calls, saying, “A wants to report. I want to do so, good, good, love, kis, kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kis kiss kis kis kis kis kis kis kis

kisk

(i) the system has divided a conversation that contains a friendly content that could not be exchanged between the employees and customers of a simple main shop, such as the word “Evedive Sea.”

C. The Plaintiff heard the contents of the recorded call and came to know the relationship between C and the Defendant, and demanded the Defendant to adjust the relationship with C around July 2018, but the Defendant, thereafter, attempted to use the same flight convenience by following telephone communications with C until March 2019.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The judged couple shall live together, and have the obligation to support and cooperate with each other; and

(Article 826 of the Civil Act). Husband and wife, as a community in which mental, physical, or economic combination is achieved, shall have the duty to cooperate and protect each other in a comprehensive manner so that marriage as a marital community is maintained, and shall have the right to such a duty.

As such, as the content of the marital or marital life maintenance obligation, the married couple bears the sexual duty that should not commit any unlawful act.

Accordingly, one side of the married couple's misconduct.