2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

A. The Plaintiff was the chief director of C Union from February 28, 2008 to February 28, 2016, and the Defendant was the representative of C Union from February 28, 2009.

B. From March 2016, the Defendant accused the Plaintiff as indicated below.

The plaintiff in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act in 2016-type 15607 by the Seoul Southern District Public Prosecutor's Office, as a result of the accusation of the name of the crime of the case number, took photographs of the text message sent by the candidate to the representative of the president in the election process of the president of the CF on February 2, 2016

On April 25, 2016, the Plaintiff in violation of the D Law No. 2016 of the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office 2016-type 6606, which was dismissed on April 25, 2016, delivered one gift set of KRW 30,000 to the representatives and executive officers of the CF around January 8, 2016. From November 2015 to February 2016, the Plaintiff produced 7,000 copies of the consignment calendar on which his/her name was entered as the candidate for the election of the president of the CF.

On August 3, 2016, the Plaintiff violated D Law No. 20165, 2016-type 41065 of the Seoul Southern District Public Prosecutor’s Office, 3 Seoul Southern District Public Prosecutor’s Office, 2016-type 41065, for the purpose of preventing the other party candidate from being elected at the president of the CUnion, provided film viewing and meals to the representatives and executive officers and employees of the CUnion on December 15, 2016. On January 20, 2016, the Plaintiff sent to the representatives the CUnion’s general evaluation of business management in 2015. On January 22, 2016, the Plaintiff provided five food to the representatives, including the chairperson, etc. of the said Election Management Committee, provided five representatives on January 27, 2016. On January 27, 2016.

Facts that there is no dispute over the charges (applicable to the lack of evidence) on November 25, 2016, each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including the number of branch offices), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant brought an accusation against the plaintiff with respect to the plaintiff except for the election of the representatives of the CUnions, and thereby, the plaintiff has a significant mental disability.