장해등급결정처분취소
1. The Defendant’s disposition of disability ratings rendered against the Plaintiff on October 27, 2014 is revoked.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On September 4, 2010, the Plaintiff was under the influence of a static and anti-explosion due to a traffic accident, and was under the control of a diplomatic mission, on March 2, 2011, under the control of the left-hand shoulder.
B. On October 17, 2011, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the East Asian University Hospital that “the shouldering movement scope under the AMA method has decreased to 235 degrees,” and received the determination of the disability grade of Grade VI due to delay (or failure) disability on October 31, 201.
C. The Plaintiff submitted to the Defendant a certificate of disability on October 13, 2014 issued by the East Asian University Hospital for the purpose of the adjudication, following three years after the determination of the above disability grade.
The above disability diagnosis statement contains the opinion of the doctor in charge of the above diagnosis that "the deceased patient shall take advantage of the anti-refluence of the mission of the Republic of Korea on March 2, 201 from the above diagnosis name (on the other hand, pulverververization of the upper end) to the main body under the name of the doctor in charge (on March 2, 201. The scope of movement at the left end is no prior opinion compared with the relocation."
On October 24, 2014, the Defendant rendered a rating out to the Plaintiff on the following grounds, and notified the Plaintiff of the result of the determination of the disability grade (hereinafter “instant disposition”). On October 27, 2014, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the result of the determination of the disability grade (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
6th 1 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case where the condition of a human mission is not outstanding after performing the sacrificing on the upper shoulder part of the criteria for disability grade determination (e.g., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., g., e., g., e., e., e., e., e. g., e. e. g. e., e. e. sacrine or e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. sacrifine or e. e., e. e. sacrifine or e. e. g. g. g., e., e. g. g., e. g., e. g., e., e. g. g.
Accordingly, the plaintiff is subject to the position of the visiting officer.