조세범처벌법위반
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 30,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the fine shall be 100.
Punishment of the crime
On February 9, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Eastern District Court for fraud, etc. and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 26, 2012.
1. He/she shall not submit to the Government a list of total tax invoices by seller without supplying or being supplied with goods or services, entered a false list of total tax invoices by seller;
Around January 25, 2009, the Defendant: (a) around 297 in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seongdong-gu; (b) from October 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008, the Defendant provided goods, etc. equivalent to KRW 245,195,00; (c) from October 1, 2008, to (d) IMK with goods, etc. equivalent to KRW 60,220,00; (d) provided goods, etc. equivalent to the above amount, the Defendant entered the list of tax invoices by customer in the list of tax invoices by customer; (d) during the same period, the Defendant provided goods, etc. equivalent to KRW 128,190,00,000 from (d) Dandong-do, Seongdong-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, with goods, etc. equivalent to KRW 167,60,00,000, to employees who were supplied with the list of tax invoices by seller.
2. No person shall issue or be issued a tax invoice without supplying or being supplied with goods or services receiving the tax invoice;
A. A. Around November 30, 2008, the Defendant issued a false tax invoice of KRW 24,500,000 on the supply price of D issuance, as the Defendant supplied goods equivalent to KRW 24,50,000, although there was no fact that he supplied goods, such as gambling, at the D office of the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant, located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to D branch.
B. Around December 23, 2008, the Defendant issued a false tax invoice of KRW 25,720,000 of the supply value of D issuance, as the Defendant supplied goods equivalent to KRW 25,720,00, although there was no fact that he supplied goods, such as gambling, at the same place, to (i) DNA.
C. The Defendant is at the same place around December 30, 2008.