However, this judgment has become final and conclusive against Defendant A.

1. The Defendant, at around November 18, 2012, appeared as a witness of the Defendant case, including a special robbery against Defendant D and six other Defendants, at the Daejeon District Court Branch No. 110, Seocheon-dong, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Daejeon District Court No. 110, Seocheon-do.

The Defendant received the following teachers from C and received money from his wife to the effect that he will also give rise to perjury, and accordingly, I asked the prosecutor’s question that “I have no money from the Defendants on May 30, 2012, and I would like to know that I would have come to know that I would have come to know that I would not pay money. I would have come to know that I would have come to know that I would not have come to know that I would have come to know that I would have come to know that I would have come to know that I would have come to attend the investigative agency, and that I would not have come to know that I would have "I would have come to know that I would have come to know that I would not have come to know," and that "I would have come to know that I would have come to know that I would have come to know," "I would have come to know that I would have come to know" and "I would have not come to know that I would have come to know that I would have come to know that I would have no money."