However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:10 on November 6, 2018, the Defendant: “On the front of the police box located in C, which is located in C, a taxi,” and “On the front of the police box located in B, the Defendant heard the horses to pay a taxi fee from D and return home from the police officers affiliated with the F, which was dispatched after receiving a report of 112; “B,” and assaulted the victim’s chest with the body of the said D, which was tightly and continuously pushed the chest part of the said D, with the Defendant’s chest part, and was tightly pushed back one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Investigation Report (Attachment of Ctv Image Data) (other than the accompanying CDs) and the application of the statute;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment ( Consideration of the nature of the crime in this case, the specific form of violence exercised by the defendant, the circumstances after the crime, etc.

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., age, family relationship, reflectment, etc. of the accused);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;