징계무효확인
1. On January 4, 2019, the Defendant confirmed that the two-month disciplinary action of suspension against the Plaintiff was null and void.
2...
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is an educational foundation that establishes and operates C University, etc. schools, and the plaintiff was newly appointed as a full-time lecturer at C University on March 1, 1995, and is currently employed as an associate professor on April 1, 2008.
B. On August 3, 2018, students filed a civil petition against the Plaintiff, and ten students of the two-year course of the two-year course of the two-year course of the two-year course of the two-year course of the two-year course of the two-year course of the two-year course of the two-year course of the two-year course of the two-year course of the two,
C. After that, on August 9, 2018, the Teachers Personnel Committee deliberated on the request for heavy disciplinary action against the Plaintiff, and on September 4, 2018, the president of Cuniversity proposed a request for heavy disciplinary action against the Plaintiff.
On September 17, 2018, the Defendant Council decided to request the disciplinary action against the Plaintiff, and on October 15, 2018, the Defendant president sent to the Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee a written request for disciplinary action (hereinafter “written request for disciplinary action”) stating the following (hereinafter “written request for disciplinary action”). A.
The grounds for the request for disciplinary action against the committee's name on the date of birth and the dissatisfaction against the demotion AF 1. Students' Professor at C.C.
2. Gender discrimination and putting a part to a speech on character and toxicity:
1. A statement of the reasons for the request for a resolution on disciplinary action: 2. A copy of official document;
The contents of the explanation of reasons for the request for disciplinary resolution attached to the written request for disciplinary resolution of this case are as follows, and the defendant notified the Plaintiff of the reasons for such disciplinary resolution by delivering it to the Plaintiff.
The reasons for the disciplinary action: (a) the teachers’ disciplinary committee held the first meeting on October 26, 2018 and reported on the Plaintiff’s explanation and the students’ opinion by holding the second meeting on November 2, 2018 and held the second meeting on November 2, 2018 to the Plaintiff.