beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.01.10 2018나51

물품대금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who runs the business of supplying and constructing bathing materials under the trade name of “E”, and Defendant B is a representative director of the non-party company, and Defendant C is a person who works as an employee of the non-party company.

B. From Sep. 2008 to Oct. 10, 2008, the Plaintiff supplied and constructed bathing materials equivalent to KRW 27,441,80 to Nonparty Company, and the amount which was not paid out is KRW 12,441,800.

C. On June 21, 201, upon the request of the non-party company for additional transactions, the Plaintiff entered into a supply contract with the non-party company, setting the supply contract by setting the supply cost of KRW 18,559,30, which is the sum of KRW 12,441,800, the balance of the transaction price in the year 2008, plus KRW 6,117,500, as total transaction price, and then additionally supplies and constructs bathing materials worth KRW 6,117,50,00 from September to October 2011.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (if there is an additional number, including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff, which caused the Plaintiff’s claim, supplied and constructed bathing materials to Nonparty Company and received KRW 18,59,300 (i.e., KRW 12,441,800 from around 2008 to KRW 6,117,500 from around 201, around 201.

As the representative director of the non-party company B, the defendant C is liable for the non-party company's non-joint and several liability with respect to the non-party company's obligation to pay the price of the goods of this case to the plaintiff, who signed the non-party company's "requirements for Payment of Paragraph (5)" and "product consignee" under the supply contract (Evidence 3-1) of June 21, 201 under the name of the non-party company.

Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to pay 18,599,300 won for the instant goods and damages for delay to each Plaintiff.

B. We examine the judgment, and only the above circumstances alleged by the Plaintiff or the evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the Defendants’ obligation to pay for the instant goods to the Plaintiff of the non-party company.