If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. Around November 7, 2010, in collusion with B, the Defendant changed private documents stated that “E shall borrow a loan certificate from “D Judicial Scriveners Office” located in Ku Government-si, Defendant A, and Defendant E” and “E shall use the loan certificate as it is, and shall make a provisional attachment order stating that “E shall pay 13 million won per day (13,000,000 won) to A and by December 30, 2010.” The Defendant deleted the above part of E with the copy stating that “E shall pay 13,000 won by December 30, 2010.” The remainder shall be repaid after the completion (hereinafter in this part “E”), and the court did not accept the above part of E with any other copy stating that “E shall have the effect of provisional attachment on the property of the above E by using the above loan certificate from the beginning.”

As a result, the Defendants conspired to alter the private document under the name of E, a private document on rights and duties without authority for the purpose of uttering.

2. On November 9, 2010, in collusion with B, the Defendant filed an application for provisional attachment registration of the said E’s property with the competent governmental district court located in the Dong Government-si 1 Dong, which is available at the time of the Government-si on November 9, 2010, and submitted to the obligee A, Defendant E, and the obligor E as if he duly constituted the E-title borrowed from the name-based employee in charge of the foregoing court who did not know of the alteration.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use a false private document loan certificate as stated in the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning B and F;

1. The police in relation to G.