A. The Plaintiff entered into a contract with respect to the maintenance and repair services for each on-site computer system as ordered by the Defendant as follows:

Maintenance and repair of the D police computer system from June 16, 2017 to December 31, 2018; or 356,427,750 E unit 2017 to maintain and repair the integrated information system from June 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018; or 18,895,100 3 FF National Police Agency’s network maintenance and repair of the network and informatization equipment from June 21, 2017 to May 31, 2008;

B. On October 31, 2017, with respect to the H-site equipment maintenance and repair services, a maintenance and repair agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was concluded between July 1, 2017 and June 31, 2018, which is KRW 25,100,000 (excluding value-added tax) during the contract period (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

(c)

The Plaintiff completed each contract mentioned in the above A and the service under the instant contract, and received KRW 447,076,725 as service payment from the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, A’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and A’s evidence No. 4 (H maintenance remuneration contract, Defendant’s seal image part, and the authenticity of the entire document is presumed to be established.

The defendant has forged the contract of this case by a third party.

However, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the statement in subparagraphs 4-1 and 2 of Eul’s evidence No. 4-2 alone is not clear whether the document that I affixed the defendant’s personal seal impression is a performance certificate; (b) whether the contract of this case is a contract of this case; and (c) the defendant did not raise an objection by filing a criminal complaint against the charge of forging a private document; (d) the evidence submitted by the defendant alone is insufficient to acknowledge the forgery of the contract of this case; and (e) there is no

The above defense shall not be accepted, and the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 5, 6, and 10 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendant stated in the above paragraph A to the plaintiff.