A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

1. Defendant A

A. A. Around February 2008, the Defendant: (a) received a request from K, a trading company of G Co., Ltd., to prepare a material test report in the name of G Co., Ltd. on a valve which is not produced by G Co., Ltd.; and (b) accepted it.

On February 13, 2008, the Defendant entered L1, an employee of the said company in the name of GCO. L2, GH 2, GH 2, GY 3, GY 1, in the name of the said company, the Defendant entered the name of GYIND V/VBD NAE (product name) in the PAST 2, “10K-50A,” and the REPEN 2, GH 1, 2008, the Defendant entered the name of the said company into the GY 2, GH 1, 2008, the name of the said company, “GY 3, 200, 30, 30, 50, 206, 208, 30, 50, 50, 163, 206, 50, 206, 206, 16, 306, 50, 206, 8,”

The results of the forged material test, as described in paragraph (1), shall be sent to the above K by facsimile, and K shall have the above material test for the employees in the name of the Sejong Heavy Industries who purchased valves from J through the non-name staff of J Co., Ltd.