Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

At around 21:10 on October 18, 2012, the Defendant laid off the Defendant’s house located at the Defendant’s house located at 103 Dongri-si, 1203, to the Internet “Ww.bebe.com” site, and laid off the Defendant’s letter “E” on the message column of “E” on the bulletin board, thereby insulting the Victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to writing comments on suspect preparation;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act alleged that the defendant's act of writing the comments of this case was done within the scope of freedom of expression and constitutes a justifiable act that does not violate the social rules. However, in light of the fact that the defendant's act does not constitute a justifiable act, since the defendant's act does not constitute a legitimate act, it cannot be viewed that the defendant's act does not constitute a legitimate act.