A. The sentence of imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unhued and unfair.

B. The above sentence imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the depth of the judgment, the fact that the defendant suffered damage and gave a full agreement to the victim, and that the crime of this case was committed in light of the form of the crime and the method of the administration of law, etc., the crime of this case has no record of being punished several times due to the same crime, and the defendant has committed the crime of this case without being able to do so during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, and other unfavorable circumstances such as the motive and background leading up to the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, and other factors of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct after the crime, etc., it is difficult to view that the punishment imposed by the court below is too heavy or unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of the defendant and the prosecutor

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.