However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On August 17, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (measures after Accidents) (hereinafter referred to as the “Road Traffic Act”) led the Defendant to drive a DNA car on the front of the road at Seogpopopo City around 01:25, 2015.

At the time, it was difficult to secure the view at night, and thus, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to properly see the entire course, the left and left, and properly manipulate the steering system, brakes, etc. of the vehicle, and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a car without any reason, and the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle was destroyed to repair the car installed outside the road, and the car was destroyed to repair the car without any reason. However, the Defendant left the site without any measure, while leaving the car on the road.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driving a vehicle as stated in paragraph (1) without obtaining a driver’s license from approximately 2 km section from the road near the west-dong Stop-si, Seopopo-si, Seopo-si to the front road in Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reports on the occurrence of a traffic accident, investigation report on the actual condition of a traffic accident, and related photographs;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (on the driving distance);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148, 54(1) (not to take any measure after an accident, to select a sentence), Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act (Article 152 subparag. 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act (Article 152 subparag. 1 and 153 of the Road Traffic Act) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 38 (2), and 50 of the said Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for community service and lecture attendance order shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances:

The favorable circumstances: The defendant recognizes all of the crimes of this case and reflects them, and criminal punishment heavier than the fine.