However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 00:05 on May 13, 2014, the Defendant was reported to the effect that the cash withdrawn from the cash withdrawal machine was lost in front of the “C” convenience store located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, and then asked the Defendant for the circumstances, etc. where the Defendant lost the money to the Defendant by the police officer affiliated with the Mapo-gu Police Station D District Unit of the Mapo-gu Police Station called out after receiving a report from 112.

B. Chewing, Chewing, bottled, bottled, and freshed, “A” was his hand at one time at the same time and obstructed police officials’ legitimate performance of their duties concerning the handling of 112 declarations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of obstruction of the performance of official duties (6-1-4 months) / [decision of sentence] the crime of this case is deemed to have used violence against police officers performing official duties while wearing their uniform, and its nature is bad, but the defendant is contrary to the crime; the defendant does not have any criminal record; the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and method of the crime of this case; the motive and method of the crime of this case; and the circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as per the order, taking into account the following factors.