However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, on September 2015, committed early September 2015, 2015, obstructed the convenience store business of the said victim by force by failing to enter the said victim’s convenience store by leaving the chill in the state of alcohol at “E” convenience store operated by the victim D in Incheon Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, at around 14:00, the date of September 1, 2015.

2. On September 2015, the Defendant committed a crime in the middle of September 2015, the Defendant interfered with the convenience store business of the said victim by force by force by failing to enter the said victim’s convenience store by driving it out while drinking at the “H” convenience store operated by the victim G located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Incheon, and preventing customers from falling into the said facility under the influence of alcohol.

3. A crime committed on February 11, 2016;

A. On February 11, 2016, at the convenience store managed by the victim J of the victim I located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, the Defendant does not take part in 1,500 won a week equivalent to the market price in which the victim's surveillance was neglected.

Mauritius stolen it.

B. At the time and place set forth in Paragraph 3-A, the Defendant, without permission from the injured party J, does not take the alcoholic beverages as above.

Smoking, on the ground that the above victim dices, and the said victim shots down and resists, it obstructed the victim J's convenience store business by force by preventing customers from entering the place of convenience store, such as lyings, on the floor of the convenience store.

4. A crime committed on March 17, 2016;

A. On March 17, 2016, the Defendant, at the convenience store operated by the Victim M in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Gyeyang-gu L, the Defendant, at around 13:00 on March 17, 2016, did not take the cresh in which the surveillance of the said victim was neglected, at the market price equivalent to KRW 1,500.

Mauritius stolen it.

B. The Defendant, at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 4-a. The Defendant, without the victim’s consent, discharged alcoholic beverages as above.

In the end, the above victim is able to calculate and resist.