2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected, and that the defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the complainant against FF (hereinafter "F") in order to issue a payment order for KRW 329,968,48,483 of the price of the goods against F (hereinafter "F"), and the F-owned real estate was subject to a provisional attachment order, and the defendant concealed F's assets for the purpose of evading compulsory execution by transferring F's assets and goodwill to G, and closing its business, and the crime is not good, and the crime is not good. The crime of evading compulsory execution requires strict punishment due to the crime that obstructs the effectiveness of compulsory execution and creditors' legitimate exercise of rights; the crime of evading compulsory execution is committed; even if I suffered large damage, the defendant did not pay any effort to recover damage to F-owned, and the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc. was considered as a whole, and the sentence imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.