손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 135,287,421 as well as 5% per annum from January 4, 2012 to April 22, 2016 to the Plaintiff.
Facts of recognition
The defendant around 09:20 on January 3, 2012, at the D Safety Center office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the defendant was punished for minor city expenses due to the business issues related to the oil oil of the plaintiff and ambulances, and went to the plaintiff following the D Safety Center.
The defendant, who was punished by the plaintiff in the aftermath of the plaintiff, was booming his balth and balp with his balthm, and was salped by his balthm, and had the plaintiff go beyond the face of the plaintiff in drinking twice, and had the head go against the concrete floor.
As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the Plaintiff, such as the Plaintiff’s ductal dulle of the left two ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal ductal
(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff was escorted to the police hospital immediately after the instant accident, and was hospitalized in the police hospital surgery from January 3, 2012 to the 6th day of the same month, and thereafter was transferred to the Seoul Asan Hospital, and was performed an emergency operation on January 6, 2012. On February 15, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to a sexual surgery on the framework of the two frameworks, and was conducted on March 19, 2012.
The plaintiff from January 6, 2012 to the same year
3. From March 24, 2012 to March 24, 2012, hospitalized in the rehabilitation department of the Seoul Asan Hospital and received treatment.
4. Until December 13, 199, he was hospitalized in a sanatorium and received medical treatment;
On November 13, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million for the crime of assaulting at the Seoul Central District Court (2013dan1889) on November 13, 2013, and the said judgment was finalized on February 21, 2014 through the appellate court (Seoul Central District Court 2013No4078).
[Reasons for Recognition] Fact-finding, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4, Eul evidence Nos. 12, and the purport of the whole pleadings is acknowledged. According to the above fact-finding, the defendant suffered damages due to the accident of this case.