However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 11, 2015, at around 23:10, the Defendant: (a) described the D main points operated by the victim C in Busan Shodong-gu, Busan; and (b) provided a request for alcohol; (c) however, the Defendant, knowing that the Defendant was aware that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and said that “the Defendant would not drink.”, he interfered with the Defendant’s bar business by force over about 20 minutes, such as friencing frien, frien, knife, knife, knife, and knife knife.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to victims;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts (the point of interference with business and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1));

1. An order to attend a lecture under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act (to prevent the second offense of violence related to drinking);