If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On May 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 01:40 on May 27, 2016, in the “D’s operation” of the Victim C located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si; (b) as a matter of calculating the drinking value with the victim, tamp B, which is located in the room room in the room of the Si with the victim, was destroyed by three tampling the victim’s property at the front of the total market value of KRW 15,00,00,000, in front of the market value of KRW 45,000,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Written estimate and a statement of transaction;

1. Application of photograph (List 2) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. According to Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, all of the sentencing factors indicated in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, living environment, and circumstances after the crime, shall be considered together, and the sentence shall be determined as indicated in the order, taking into account all of the sentencing factors indicated in the instant case, such as the circumstances favorable to the Defendant (a confession, actual damage is deemed to be relatively minor, and the victim’s prior consent is deemed to have agreed on the victim’s wife), unfavorable circumstances (not only the previous ones, but also the crime in the instant case is syke, without being aware of a variety of criminal records at least two times, such as the Defendant’s age,