2. Comprehensively taking account of the arguments in this case and the reasons for sentencing indicated in the record, the lower court appears to have been reasonably determined by fully considering the various reasons for sentencing alleged by the Defendant, and there is no special circumstance to ex post facto change the sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, since it is evident that the Defendant’s appeal is a clerical error in the amount of approximately KRW 68,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).