The punishment of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The crime of this case was committed under the influence of 0.131% of alcohol content while the defendant was driving at a crosswalk according to the pedestrian signal, and the victim was injured by shocking the lane. Rather, the crime of this case was not committed under the influence of the victim's face with the hand floor. The defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime due to robbery, the crime of injury by robbery, the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, etc., and the defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime. The defendant was punished several times due to drinking or non-licenses. The defendant paid KRW 3 million and agreed with the victim. favorable circumstances such as the defendant's vehicle is covered by comprehensive insurance, and other favorable conditions such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, etc., the defendant's age and conditions of sentencing as stated in the records and arguments of this case, and the scope of guidelines for sentencing (Article 2 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents).

In light of the above, it cannot be deemed that the punishment is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is not reasonable.