The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the court of first instance, the court below’s rejection of Defendant’s defense and finding Defendant guilty of this case’s charges on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the law of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence or by misapprehending the legal principles on self-defense.

Meanwhile, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. As such, the determination of the sentence is unreasonable.

The argument that the court below erred in incomplete deliberation or mistake of facts with regard to sentencing conditions is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.