, however, the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final.

[criminal records] On October 25, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a year of imprisonment for fraud in the support of the Southern District Court of Jeonju on the last day of the same year, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 2 of the same year.

[2] The Defendant: (a) operated the pawned Art. (1) from around April 1972 to April 2016, the Defendant: (b) operated the pawned Art. (3); (c) operated the pawned Art. (1) as a collateral to the victims E, who were known to the general public while operating the pawned Art. (1) in South-si; (d) borrowed money from the injured party; and (e) borrowed money from the injured party; and (e) returned money to the injured party; and (e) operated the pawned Art.

1. The Defendant, on March 2014, lent “70 million won to the victim at interest rate of 1.5% per month” in the said pawned Center around March 2014, to offer the corresponding precious metals as security if he/she lent it to the victim at interest rate of 1.5% per month.

“Along with the purport of the foregoing, the entire precious metal was carried out as if it was a valuable thing that can secure the above borrowed money.

However, in fact, from among goods offered as security as above, Rawls have no value as security because it is not a material but a material that is not a material.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 70 million won including 1 million won of the guaranteed value of the above roller 1 point in sight from the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and defrauds 1 million won from the victim.

2. The Defendant committed the crime from May 2015 to July 2015 of the same year between the Defendant and the victim from May 2015 to July 2015, and the victim has discovered precious metals.

Other precious metal of the same amount shall be left.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, even if we find the precious metal that has been entrusted to the victim as security, it was merely the intention to leave the fake precious metal, and there was no intention or ability to leave another precious metal of the same value.

Nevertheless, there is a need to do so.