beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.08.11 2013가합18304

배당이의

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) Indication of real estate in the consultation and facility protection contract for the Plaintiff and Red Profit Co., Ltd.: The price, terms and conditions of payment, and scope of consultation under Article 2 of the land and its ground buildings in Busan Seo-gu;

1. The payment terms of Nonparty Company’s price payment 1) must be based on the guarantee of the purchaser’s will of the real estate owned by Nonparty Company and Nonparty Company. 2) The Plaintiff shall be paid KRW 200 million up to October 30, 2012. 3) The Plaintiff shall be paid KRW 300 million up to December 30, 2012, and KRW 524,800,000 in the balance of the hospital’s revenues shall be paid up to 50% until the hospital’s revenues are fully paid.

5 Additional Tax Table

2. The scope and contents of consulting and facility protection work 1) The Plaintiff: (a) the Plaintiff: (b) the duty of arranging the site in order for the Nonparty Company to obtain a loan from a financial institution; (c) the termination of the floating comprehensive mortgage on floating sum Construction Co., Ltd.; (d) the security service for the protection of facilities owned by the Nonparty Company

3. Where the conclusion that real estate sale is impossible is not possible due to the reduction in the scope of a contract, the non-party company’s instant service contract is terminated, and the cost incurred in the facility protection security service is the actual cost and the cost that was paid to the non-party company should be paid immediately to the Plaintiff by settling accounts for the cost that was paid.

(1) The plaintiff shall submit the results under Article 2(1) through (3) to the non-party company. The plaintiff shall submit the results under Article 2(1) to the non-party company.

Article 6 The contract term of this Agreement is as of October 30, 2012.

1) On October 10, 2012, the Plaintiff is Red Profit Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Seong Company”).

(1) The consulting and facility protection agreement (hereinafter referred to as “instant service agreement”) with the following terms and conditions:

(2) There was no fact that the loan to the non-party company was executed for the non-party company with respect to the Busan Seo-gu E and its ground buildings.