except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person engaging in driving village buses B.

At around 23:40 on December 3, 2013, the Defendant was driving the above village bus, and was in progress in the direction of lectures from the edge of the water course to the edge of the water zone.

Since there is a crosswalk where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service is a person who gets on the way to reduce the speed and to check the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are well and to proceed safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, when the defendant neglected this and did not discover the victim C (55 years old) who dried a crosswalk from the right side to the left side in accordance with the pedestrian signals at the front side of the defendant's right side when the defendant violated and proceeded with the signal, and received the victim as the front part of the above village bus and suffered injury, such as the right shoulder, which requires about seven weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution; Article 62 (1) of the same Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 20