except that the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On January 4, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's net support on January 4, 2008, and a summary order of KRW 5 million as the same crime in the same court on January 10, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

On January 18, 2020, at around 23:51, the Defendant driven a F UA6 car in the state of alcohol 0.052% alcohol concentration at approximately 200 meters from the front of the C cafeteria, which is located in the C cafeteria B, to the front of the E cafeteria located in the Mecheon City D.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Inquiry into the result of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previouss before ruling: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of each summary order-related Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2(1) and 44(1) of the former Road Traffic Act (wholly amended by Act No. 17371, Jun. 9, 2020); the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) the Defendant’s blood alcohol density at the time of the instant case; and (b) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, criminal records (which have the records of being sentenced to two times a fine due to the same kind of crime); (c) the distance of drunk driving; and (d) the circumstances after the instant crime, etc.,