2. In light of the substance, method, etc. of the crime of this case committed by the Defendant, the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant are recognized, such as the fact that the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime in light of the content, method, etc. of the crime, and that there was a record of punishment of fines twice due

However, it is hard to say that the defendant would not repeat the crime of this case again while making a statement that he made a confession of the crime of this case and reflects his depth of the mistake, that police officers do not have any special damage due to the defendant's assault, that it is a contingent crime, that there is no criminal record beyond the same kind of criminal record, and that there is no criminal record beyond the fine. The court below did not have any circumstance to deem the judgment of the court below significantly unfair, that there is no circumstance to deem the judgment of the court below to be considerably unfair, that there is no dependent, balance with the ordinary sentencing in the same or similar case, and other various circumstances that are the conditions of the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, character, character, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, criminal records, family relations, health conditions, etc., the prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.