When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 3, 2018, around 19:40 on June 3, 2018, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol, alcohol, etc., under the presumption that the Defendant would normally pay the drinking value at the Esing room of the victim D’s operation in Busan City, Sinsi-gu C.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price normally even if he was provided with alcohol, alcohol, etc. from the injured party.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 420,000 from the injured party, an alcoholic beverage and an alcoholic beverage, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant again commits the instant crime during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime. However, the defendant is sentenced to a fine by taking into account the fact that the defendant pays the total amount of damages within 80 days after the instant crime was committed, that he/she agreed with the victim, and that he/she is in contravention of the provision of the Criminal Procedure Act.