The lower court, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, determined that the instant facts charged were recognized, and rejected the grounds of appeal on the mistake of facts that asserted them.

The judgment below

In light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the Juvenile Protection Act and intentional act, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.