beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.24 2015고단2799

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 21, 2015, the Defendant, a representative engineer at around 00:42 on June 21, 2015, arrives in front of the Defendant’s home located in the 3rd floor E in the 3rd floor E House at the time the Defendant, a representative engineer at around 00:42, the Defendant would bring money to the Defendant’s home and pay a proxy driving fee.

approximately 40 minutes, after entering the house "........"

Accordingly, when the injured person demands the accused to pay the substitute driving fee by posting the phone, the accused is facing the face outside of the window, and the victim is "I see, I see, why you see, why you see, and why I see, and why I see;

Chewing fluor, fluor of a bitch, fluor of a bitch.

"Plastics of plastic, which are dangerous objects in the room while taking a bath, have a direction-setting system out of the window, and assaulted the victim.

2. On June 21, 2015, the Defendant, upon receiving a report from D that “the Defendant takes away goods out of his house,” recommended the Defendant to pay a driving fee on behalf of the Defendant when the Defendant arrived at the Defendant’s house and confirmed the details of the Defendant’s report by the slope G and the senior police officer affiliated with the Suwon Police Station in the Suwon Police Station of the Suwon Police Station, who called out after receiving a report from D, to the effect that “the Defendant takes off the goods outside of his house.”

As the phrase “sing off and running outside of the house”, he cut the string of the dried G with body, cut the dried G with the body, cut the string of the two arms, put the arms of the victim H who caused the string of it, and assault G and H.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of crimes G and H, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made by the police in each protocol of police statements related to D, H and G;

1. Application of each of the video Acts and subordinate statutes to the scene pictures, damaged parts, and screen pictures of the case;

1. Relevant Article 261 of the Criminal Act, Articles 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of special assault) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the obstruction of the performance of official duties) concerning criminal facts.