beta
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2016.11.18 2016가단211872

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendants jointly hold the Plaintiff KRW 5,00,000, KRW 3,000,000, and each of the above amounts to the Plaintiff B and C.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A (GG students) and Defendant D (H students) are currently high school students, and Plaintiff B, Defendant E, and F are the parents of Defendant D.

[Judgment of the court below] Each crime (hereinafter “each of the crimes of this case”)

1. Defendant D, I, etc. met each other with women at a friendly telecom with each other. In 2014, Defendant D, I, etc., borrowed two rooms from the Kmotoel located in the J of Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, and then, in one of them, the Plaintiff A (Woo, 15 years old), L, and M as youth, together with the Plaintiff A (Woo, 15 years old), L, and M, “W,” and “Wus game,” and “Wus game,” have the game users drink alcohol as a penalty provision.

2. Defendant D exceeded, at the above temporary border, the part of the Plaintiff A’s defense room cannot be identified, and she laid down his sexual organ into the Plaintiff’s entrance, and continued to be off the Plaintiff’s fright and panty, and inserted the Plaintiff’s sexual organ into the Defendant’s sexual organ.

Accordingly, Defendant D quasi-rapeed the Plaintiff A, a juvenile who was in a state of impossibility to resist.

3. As set forth in the above paragraph 2 above, Defendant D was able to meet with I on the way of quasi-rapeing and emitting Plaintiff A.

I heard from Defendant D that he had sexual intercourse with Plaintiff A, and told himself that he would like to have sexual intercourse with Plaintiff A, and Defendant D said that “I would like to have sexual intercourse with Plaintiff A”, and Defendant D and I would like to jointly commit rape with Plaintiff A, on the ground that “I would like to do so any more than once, you will do so, and I would like to commit rape with Plaintiff A.”

At the time and place of the above paragraph 3 above, Defendant D and I reported the network at the entrance of the above telecom, and Defendant D inserted his sexual organ at the sexual organ of the Plaintiff A, which was in the state of exploitation, and Defendant D inserted Defendant D’s sexual organ at the time of the Plaintiff A’s sexual intercourse with the Plaintiff, and immediately Plaintiff A inserted his sexual organ at the time of the Plaintiff’s sexual organ.

Accordingly, Defendant D.