beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.04.14 2014고단938

도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Height938]

1. On September 14, 2014, around 19:20, the Defendant driven G rocketing car at the 1km section from the front of the D cafeteria located in Ischeon-si C to the Fda in front of the Fda in E.

However, H, who operates the above FC, confirmed the form of the Defendant’s vehicle as a parking lot through CCTV installed outside the above FC, and stated that the Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance, such as running the said vehicle at the place of business, and noise to the customers under the influence of alcohol. On the other hand, H, upon receiving a report, stated that the Defendant was unable to do so, and that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, there was considerable reason to recognize that the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as making a statement that the Defendant was able to confirm the fact of driving the said vehicle through CCTV installed outside the FCC.

Accordingly, the Defendant refused to comply with a police officer’s demand for alcohol alcohol measurement for about 30 minutes from around 21:09 to around 21:39, and failed to comply with the police officer’s demand for alcohol alcohol measurement without justifiable grounds.

[Attachment 2015 order 5]

2. Around 00:20 on September 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed the attitude that the Defendant expressed the Defendant’s desire to take the H from the FC from the 00th page of the H’s operation in Ischeon-si, Echeon-si, to “Instition, she must be treated as one year equally, she must be treated as one year, she must be treated as one year, she must be treated as one year, and she should be treated as one year immediately; and (b) made intimidation.”

3. On October 21, 2014, at around 18:19, the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle so that the amount of the repair cost is influent, by continuously driving the Defendant’s vehicle and making it defective by shocking the part of the vehicle, which is the victim H, by using the Defendant’s vehicle, while disputing the issue of the victim H (n, 42 years of age) and the repayment of the borrowed money.

4...