Japan's jurisdiction is recognized in accordance with the principles of international jurisdiction under the statutes of the Republic of Korea or treaties, and Japan's jurisdiction does not violate the good customs and other social order of the Republic of Korea, and the defendant received a complaint, a document equivalent thereto, and a notice of date or order in the above application case by service by public notice or similar service.

There is no data to acknowledge that Japan has not lawfully served this, and furthermore, there is a provision on the same purport as the Civil Procedure Act of Korea concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, and it is considered that the conditions for Japan to enforce Korean judgments are the same as Korea, and eventually there is a mutual guarantee between Korea and Japan to recognize the validity of each other's judgments.

Thus, Japan's above judgment is permitted as a compulsory execution in Korea by satisfying all the conditions under Article 217 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case seeking a judgment of execution of the above judgment is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.