소유권이전등기
1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, and Defendant G:
(a) trade on October 1, 2009, respectively;
1. Basic facts
A. Status 1 of the parties) The Plaintiff’s respective real estate listed in the [Attachment 1] List (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).
A apartment located in Daegu Dong-gu I (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment”).
(2) A housing reconstruction project of this case (hereinafter referred to as “instant reconstruction project”)
The Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter referred to as the “Urban Improvement Act”) shall apply.
The Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction and rearrangement project partnership established under the Housing Reconstruction and Improvement Project Association. The Plaintiff is authorized to establish an association from the Daegu-dong head of the Gu on August 16, 2006 (hereinafter “instant authorization disposition”).
(2) The Defendants are each owners of each of the relevant real estate (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant real estate”) indicated in the detailed statement of the conclusion of the sales contract on February 28, 2007, as well as indicated in the column for “owned and occupied real estate” in attached Form 2.
B. The Plaintiff’s announcement of the application for parcelling-out and the announcement of extension of the application for parcelling-out as to July 23, 2009, and on September 11, 2009, the Plaintiff issued an announcement of the application for parcelling-out to its members, and on September 30, 2009, the extension of the application period for parcelling-out extended from September 11, 2009 to September 30, 2009. (2) However, at the time, Defendant B, J, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant E, Defendant F, and K did not apply for parcelling-out by September 30, 2009, the expiration date of the above extension period.
3) 한편, 피고 C는 2010. 11. 1. 협의분할에 의한 상속을 원인으로 위 J 소유이던 별지1. 목록 순번 제2부동산에 대하여 소유권이전등기를 마쳤고, 피고 G은 2012. 4. 9. 매매를 원인으로 위 K 소유이던 별지1. 목록 순번 제6부동산에 대하여 소유권이전등기를 마침으로써 위 피고들은 원고의 조합원으로서의 지위를 포괄 승계하였다. 다. 관련 법령 및 원고 정관규정 ◎ 구 도시정비법(2009. 5. 27. 법률 제9729호로 개정되기 전의 것) 제47조(분양신청을 하지 아니한 자 등에 대한 조치 사업시행자는...