The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

The defendant was enrolled in the OO high school located in the Won-si, and was engaged in activities in B, and the victim C (n, 27 years old) was issued as the above high school Bco around July 2017 and became aware of the defendant.

The victim was married to have a spouse and children, and the defendant was also aware of this.

The defendant and the victim, while he he he he he he he he he he he he he he he he he he was in the first sexual relationship around November 2017, when he was he was he was he was he was he was he was in the second line in the B. However, the victim was unable to access the defendant, such as interfering with his privacy and changing the identification number of his place of residence because the defendant was in violence from the defendant on March 2018.

Accordingly, the defendant thought that he cannot be hedgingd with the victim, found the victim's residence against the victim's will and began to exercise violence against the victim who does not hear his horses.

1. On April 20, 2018, the Defendant of the damage to property: (a) on the road near the OE A4 car operation near the OE high school located in the Republic of Korea, Won-si; and (b) on the part of the victim, the Defendant sent the victim the “to attend the bar shortly,” and (c) on the part of the victim, the Defendant sent the victim the answer “I would like to see why I would see the horses?”; (d) on the part of the victim, the Defendant left the studio in front of the studio of the said car.”

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim so that the repair cost equivalent to 1.8 million won, such as studio exchange cost, etc.

2. On April 20, 2018, from around 21:35 to 02:00 of the following day, the Defendant, in response to the withdrawal of the victim, told the victim at the home of the victim of the F apartment G in the original state of the F apartment G, saying, “the victim is a woman-child relationship,” and asked the victim to go back at the victim’s home, but he/she was asked to go back at the victim’s home without any justifiable reason, and left the victim’s home without any justifiable reason and left the victim’s home.

2.2