If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On August 9, 2020, the Defendant reported in front of the C mountain father in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul on August 01:25, 2020, at around 01:25, and 112, the Seoul sent out after receiving a report that “the male who ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever

The Ba. D. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. B. 3. B. B.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Video storage CDs and caps photographs with respect to E in the police statement protocol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (CCTV image analysis);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have any record of being punished for the same kind of crime, the recognition of a crime, and the attitude of pening a mistake, and the intention of assault against police officers is not so significant;

In light of the fact that the defendant seems to have been sentenced to punishment as ordered by taking into account all the conditions of sentencing, such as the age, sex, family relationship, details of the crime and circumstances after the crime.