2. Although there are favorable circumstances, such as the confession and rebuttal of the defendant, the fact that the defendant made an agreement with the victim, the fact that the defendant is in a position to support his family, the crime of this case is committed by threatening the victim in a kacker knife, which is a dangerous object without any particular reason, in light of the motive or tool of the crime, and the crime of this case is not good in light of the motive or tool of the crime, and the criminal liability is very heavy, and the defendant has a history of punishment several times due to violence in the past, the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court (one-one year imprisonment), and other factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence after the crime, are considered, it cannot be deemed that the punishment imposed by the court below is excessively unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.