On June 29, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 17:40, and driven the two-lane road at about 60 km from the area where the deceased died at the time of euthanasia, the Defendant continued to drive the two-lanes at the speed of about 60 km from the area where the deceased died at the time of euthanasia.

A driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate steering devices, brakes, etc. according to the traffic conditions of the road and to secure a safety distance to avoid collision with the motor vehicle ahead of it.

The Defendant neglected to do so and neglected his duty, thereby resulting in the Defendant’s failure to take part in the front part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle, after the victim C (n, 34 years old)’s dhumburged vehicle, which started without delay by signal, etc. at the front direction of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the above victim C, such as chill tensions, tensions, etc., on the victim C (V, 30 years of age) who was accompanied by the damaged vehicle for about two weeks, suffered from the injury of chills, tensions, etc., and the injury of the same victim E (V, 2 years of age) in the event of treatment days, respectively.

2. Relevant Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act: Judgment of time for prosecution under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents: Subparagraph 6 of Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act (the records of this case, following the institution of the prosecution of this case, a traffic accident agreement stating the victims who wish not to punish the defendant was submitted on October 18, 2018).