When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 6, 2013, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2,50,00,000 from the Seoul Eastern District Court due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion).

The defendant is the representative director of the D Co., Ltd. which is the subcontractor of the construction in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office Officetel

On November 27, 2013, the Defendant removed the door locking system of each officetel from employees of service enterprises, including E, for the purpose of receiving the construction cost of the above Ctel, and enter into the door and enter the door.

The aim was to instruct the host owners to prevent them from entering into the bill.

The employees of service companies, including E, who received the Defendant’s instructions from 21:30 to 10 December 201, 2013, opened the entrance locking devices of the entrance set forth in Section 301 of the above C Officetel, which are owned by the victim against the victim’s will, from 21:30 to 30,000 on the same day, and entered it, and entered it, in the same manner, such as [Attachment] Nos. 1, 2, 9, 10, and 15 [Attachment] list of crimes, and entered it.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with the employees of the service company ordered by the defendant to intrude into the victims' residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement in G in the 3rd or 9th public trial records;

1. Written statements and petitions of F, H, I, J, and K;

1. Application of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes to each photograph, CD ( photographic file), CD ( photographic, video) or statute;

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act and Articles 319 of the same Act and Articles 319 of the same Act concerning the selection of criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. On November 27, 2013, the Defendant entered an officetel owned by the victims, such as 3,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, and 14, in the same manner as the criminal facts stated in the judgment from around 21:30 to October 10, 2013.

In this respect, the defendant received the direction of the defendant.