2. The judgment is against the defendant's confession of criminal facts, the defendant is found to have been exposed to the police's drinking control, not to cause a traffic accident, but it is recognized that the defendant committed the crime in this case where he drives a motor vehicle in the state of drinking alcohol concentration of 0.111% even though he had been punished twice as a same crime, and the distance of the defendant's driving is not shorter than 1 km, considering all favorable circumstances favorable to the defendant, the court below seems to have determined the punishment by taking into account the circumstances that are favorable to the defendant, the fact that there is no special change in the trial, and other various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing in the records and arguments of this case, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too excessive and unfair. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.