However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is between the victim D (n, 28 years of age) and the victim D.

1. Inflicting a victim D;

A. On April 24, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 04:20 on April 24, 2016, at around 04:20, 2016, the Defendant: (b) 49 of the Geamban-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, Gecheon-gun, Gecheon-gun, Gecheon-gun, Gero Bus Terminal; (c) caused the victim’s body without any interest by making use of drinking and saliva on the ground that the victim was misunderstanding

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the number of days of treatment, shoulder, knee, knee's knee's knee's tye's felma

B. On August 19, 2016, the same is as indicated in the judgment on the number of crimes attached to self-injury.

On August 19, 2016, the Defendant written the written indictment in such a manner that he/she was asked from the victim at the time of his/her death on August 17, 2016 at the time of his/her death on August 17, 2016, in a manner that he/she severely faced with head on the asphalt floor by putting him/her out, and she was asked from the victim at the time of his/her death on August 17, 2016, the Defendant stated “in the same manner.” This means the assault on August 17, 2016, namely, “a person who was flicked by a victim and flickly faced with head on the asphalt floor by putting him/her on flick and flicking him/her over by leaving him/her at the time of the assault as indicated in the reasoning of the facts charged by him/her.” The victim at an investigative agency, at the time of the assault as indicated in paragraph 1(b) of the same Article.

The statement was made (10,11th of the investigation records), and the defendant India investigative agency made a statement that the victim's balths the victim's balth (311th of the investigation records). Thus, only the fact that the defendant balths the victim's galth on the date stated in the No. 1-B of the decision of the defendant is recognized, and the defendant took a galth of the victim.

there is no evidence to consider.

This seems to be within the same scope of facts charged and actually disadvantage the defendant's right of defense.