If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

[2012 High Court Decision 2334]

1. The Defendant, at the end of April 2008, received 500,000 won from the above victim, by fraud, stating that “The above victim shall pay 500,000 won if he/she borrowed money from the victim E even if he/she borrowed money from the victim E, and he/she shall receive 50,000 won from the above victim’s place.”

2. Around May 2008, the Defendant, despite having borrowed money from the Defendant, in front of the Orcheon-gu National Bank of Ocheon-gu, Ocheon-gu, U.S., the Defendant made a false statement to the said victim stating, “I will complete the payment without molding five months after lending the amount of KRW 2 million, because the circumstances are urgent,” and then, he/she shall receive two million won from the said victim’s position, by deceiving the said victim.

3. On November 10, 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the above victim’s residence in Yong-gu, Yong-gu, Yong-gu, and even if having borrowed money from the above victim, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money. The Defendant acquired KRW 100,000 from the above victim and acquired the above victim’s money from the above victim to the above victim, stating that “A loan of KRW 1,000,000 to KRW 2,50,000 per month shall be repaid prior to the loan of additional KRW 1,00,000,000 per month.”

[2013, 56] The Defendant was working as the head of the Working Group for the Construction Work at the Construction Site of H apartment located in the area below G in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do.

1. On March 22, 2012, the Defendant: (a) issued an order of liquor amounting to KRW 720,000 to the above victim and received it from the said victim and did not pay the said amount even if the Defendant received alcoholic beverages, etc. from the said victim; (b) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the said amount by not paying the said amount even after the said victim received it from the said victim on the job; and (c) obtained pecuniary benefits by failing to pay the said amount even after the said victim received it from the said victim and together with the construction contractor’s husband;

2. On March 28, 2012, the Defendant is operating the Victim L in ASEAN.