사기등
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and for one year, for Defendant B.
Seoul Dong District Prosecutors' Office that was seized in 2019.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B The role of delivering the means of access, such as cash cards connected to the deposit account to receive the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the receipt of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment of the payment to the withdrawal of the payment of the payment. The defendant A received instructions from the above "D" and received instructions from the above "D" and delivered the money deposited in the deposit account to the other delivery of the payment of the payment of the payment. The defendant A, upon withdrawal of the money deposited in the deposit account and
1. Dec. 13, 2018, Defendant A made a false statement that “F Bank is F Bank..... Credit loans are available up to KRW 60 million. When raising the limit at KRW 100 million, the credit card loan must be repaid upon receiving the credit card loan.”
In fact, however, even if the victim received money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to repay the loan or to pay the additional loan.
Defendant
A by deceiving the victim as above such as “D” and a telephone inducement note with which the name is unknown, and then deceiving the victim from the victim to the H bank account in the name of G, 6 million won to the K bank account in the name of G, 6 million won to the K account in the name of J, and 12 million won to the K account in the name of J, and delivered the card connected to the above bank account in the name of G from the Defendant B, and delivered the card to the cash collection account after withdrawing 12 million won to the said bank account in the name of G.
As a result, Defendant A conspired with “D” or a telephone inducement policy with which the name cannot be known, and instead, acquired KRW 24 million from the victim from around that time to January 7, 2019, Defendant A acquired a total of KRW 39 million from four victims, such as the list I of crimes.
2. Frauding;