beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.08.28 2018고단1038

전기통신사업법위반등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant B and C, and Defendant D, E and F, respectively, shall be punished by imprisonment of six months, one year, and one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant D operated the “J” at the Busan Northern-gu H 2 and the Busan Northern-gu I. K, the operator of the “J” L in the Busan metropolitan traffic Daegu L, Defendant B, the operator of the “O” located in the Busan East-gu L, the head of the business division of Q(S)’s first floor in the P building in the Busan East-gu P, the head of the business division of Q(S) in the P building in the Busan Western-gu, the operator of the “T” in the Changwon-gu, Busan-si, the operator of the “T” in the “T”, Defendant E and Defendant F, who were employed in the said “T” as an employee of the said “T”, and these are engaged in mobile phone sales business.

[Carrying-on lending structure] The Defendants: (a) in the event that the credit rating is low, and the lending company is difficult at financial institutions and lending companies, or the resident registration certificates necessary for opening of the mobile phone are sent to many unspecified persons, by inducing them to borrow a mobile phone as “loan of small amount of the mobile phone; (b) the Defendants opened the mobile phone to the maximum number of persons (4 lines per person); (c) sold the opened mobile phone terminal as used goods; and (d) sold part of the acquired profits to the nominal owner; and (e) committed the crime under the law of “the so-called “the mobile phone-opener” or “U(V”), which pays part of the acquired profits to the nominal owner; (b) the loan applicant opened the mobile phone on the condition of providing funds and lending, which is not for the purpose of using the mobile phone service; and (c) then, (d) the borrower

Therefore, Defendant A, Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant F, and Defendant G recruited mobile phone owners in the nation through advertising in the rice strawet market, and a leaflet distribution and banner advertisement stating the contents of “50 to three million won in the mobile phone opening, cash payment on the day, emergency financing settlement on the day,” and “able influence of communication failure,” etc., and Defendant A directly recruited or applied for a resident registration certificate, vehicle driving license, or cellular phone opening by the cell phone holders recruited by Defendant D, Defendant E, Defendant E, Defendant F, and Defendant G.