손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) deleted the part of “the Plaintiff,” as “the Plaintiff,” as “the Plaintiff,” as “the Plaintiff,” as “the Plaintiff,” and (b) removed the part of “the Defendant,” as “the Plaintiff,” as “the Plaintiff,” as “the Plaintiff,” and (c) as to the new argument at the trial as to the Plaintiff’s new argument as to the instant case under paragraph (2). As such, it is identical to the entry of the judgment of the first instance
2. The Plaintiff asserts that, although the Defendant did not know about the monthly rent, etc. of the owner of the building and the store of this case prior to the conclusion of the instant contract, the Plaintiff acted as if the owner of the building and the owner of the building of this case, and that, at the time of the conclusion of the instant contract, “if the owner of the building entered into a new lease contract with the Plaintiff, he would not raise the monthly rent or increase it only to KRW 100,000,000,000,” and that, when he received the remainder of the premium, the Plaintiff deceivings the Plaintiff to the effect that it would not change the monthly rent, etc., it
However, as seen above, it is difficult to believe that D’s testimony by the witness at the trial who seems to be consistent with the Defendant’s deception of the Plaintiff and concluded the instant contract, in light of the above witness and the Plaintiff’s relationship, etc., and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is rejected.
3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.