Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of the claim.

A. On June 11, 2015, the Defendant issued to C a promissory note (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) at the face value of KRW 20,000,000, the bill number D, the due date for payment, October 30, 2015, which is a single bank branch in the Jeju Bank (hereinafter “instant promissory note”).

B. The first endorsement of the Promissory Notes is in the form of endorsement C, the second endorsement is in the form of endorsement, the second endorsement is in the form of endorsement, and the third endorsement is in the form of endorsement by the Plaintiff.

(each person for whom this award is made shall be the person for whom this award is made).

On October 30, 2015, the Plaintiff, as the final holder of the Promissory Notes of this case, proposed the payment of the Promissory Notes of Jeju Bank, Inc. to be made at the luminous branch of the Jeju Bank, but the said Promissory Notes was rejected due to the receipt of the accident report.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap's No. 1 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the determination as to the cause of the Plaintiff’s claim, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff, who is the final holder of the Promissory Notes of this case, the amount of KRW 20,000,000 per annum under the Commercial Act from October 31, 2015 to June 28, 2016, as the Plaintiff seeks, 6% per annum under the date of the final delivery of the Promissory Notes of this case, and 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings, from the next day to the date of full payment.

3. The defendant's argument regarding the defendant's assertion is that the defendant acquired the Promissory Notes in this case by deception B and C, and the plaintiff knowingly received the Promissory Notes in this case by endorsement and transfer, but it is not sufficient to recognize the Promissory Notes only with the statement of No. 1, and there is no other evidence to recognize it. Thus, the defendant's above assertion cannot be

4. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so ordered as per Disposition.