A. Facts of recognition 1) Net C (hereinafter “the deceased”).

) The delivery personnel shall be the delivery personnel belonging to the D store, and the defendant A shall be the E (hereinafter referred to as the “instant vehicle”).

Defendant B is the driver of the instant vehicle as Defendant A’s wife, and Defendant B is the owner of the instant vehicle, and Defendant KB Non-Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”).

(2) At around 15:00 on June 5, 2015, Defendant A parked the instant vehicle on the two-lane road of the National Institute of Specialized Agriculture and Forestry, which is located in the agricultural life of the Yanju-gun, North Korea. However, the parking lot was a zone where a yellow solid line was maintained at the edge of the road, and the Defendant A did not take measures, such as installing safety signs or displaying tail lights or sidelights lights.

3) On the same day, the Deceased was faced with the front wheel part of the instant motor vehicle on the back insertion day, and died due to damage to diversified trauma around 22:34 on the same day on the same day.

(4) The Plaintiff recognized the instant accident as an occupational accident under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and paid KRW 9,812,340, and KRW 67,720,920 to G and H, the parents of the deceased, on September 13, 2015. (5) Defendant A parked the instant vehicle in a place where it is prohibited to stop the vehicle in relation to the instant accident, and the Defendant A was issued a summary order of KRW 3,00,000 on the ground of the fact that the instant accident caused the death of the deceased by negligence, such as installation of safety signs or failure to take measures such as lights or sidelights, etc.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 11, Eul evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. As to the judgment 1 of this case, the deceased's side is examined.