beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.11.30 2017고단1582

존속상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 22, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of bodily injury, etc. in the Gwangju District Court’s Net Branch on May 24, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Net Prison on May 24, 2015. On October 20, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of bodily injury in the same court and completed the execution of the sentence in the Net Prison Prison on April 19, 2017

1. Lineal injury [2017 Height 1582] The Defendant is the victim C (V, 80 years old) and her mother and child.

On June 9, 2017, around 00:01, the Defendant returned home under the influence of alcohol at D’s residence, and put it into a locking d’s inner machine.

Doing to bring money to the victim, Doing to the victim, "I have died in the past, where I have been subject to tax calculation of the amount of money."

“In doing so, the victim’s left hand gets off the victim’s hand, and her knife off the victim’s hand, etc., and caused the victim’s injury to which the number of days of treatment cannot be known.

Accordingly, the defendant injured his lineal ascendants and descendants.

2. In light of the victim G (64 years of age) at around 17:50 on September 3, 2017, the Defendant discovered that he/she was seated in the event of “F” in the front of the victim G (64 years of age) at the time of drinking water, she fling the alcohol without any justifiable reason, and the victim “the victim expressed his/her desire to flap so that he/she can flap, and the victim flap, “the victim flap,” who led the flap, led the flap of the victim, and caused an injury on the number of days of treatment, such as the victim’s flap to tear.

3. Obstruction of the performance of official duties [2017 order 2225] On September 28, 2017, the Defendant heard the disturbance without paying the drinking value before the “I shop” located at H at F on September 28, 2017, and listened to the circumstances leading up to the position of the FJ and the police officer of the FJ station dispatched to the site upon the report of the I branch shop of the I branch of the police station, to pay for the drinking value and to return home from K. In this case, the Defendant stated that “if he does not want to die due to the head of the Go branch of FJ, he will immediately take back the drinking value, and she will do so by her name,” and the her mother was in a fluench with the left hand.